Tiza Group

Home / Guides / Standards and grid connection

IEEE 80 Grid Design Example: Square, No Rods

Worked IEEE 80 example: 70 m square grid with no rods in 400 Ω·m soil. Resistance, GPR, mesh voltage and why it is redesigned.

By Shadai García, CEO and protection engineer at Tiza Group.

70 m × 70 m grid: 11 conductors per side70 mD = 7 m · h = 0.5 mmesh voltage:center of thecorner meshmesh voltage Em vs. tolerable touch voltageexample 1: Em exceeds the limit, failsexample 2: with 20 rods of 7.5 m, passestolerable touch: 838.2 Vexample 1, norods Em = 1002.1 Vexample 2, 20rods Em = 747.4 VRg 2.78 Ω · IG 1908 A · GPR 5304 Vtolerable: touch 838.2 V; step 2686.6 VChainDataTolerable limitsRg, IG, GPREmResult© tizagrp.com70 m × 70 m grid: 11 conductors per side70 mD = 7 m · h = 0.5 mmesh voltage:center of thecorner meshmesh voltage Em vs. tolerable touch voltageexample 1: Em exceeds the limit, failsexample 2: with 20 rods of 7.5 m, passestolerable touch: 838.2 Vexample 1, norods Em = 1002.1 Vexample 2, 20rods Em = 747.4 VRg 2.78 Ω · IG 1908 A · GPR 5304 Vtolerable: touch 838.2 V; step 2686.6 VChainDataTolerable limitsRg, IG, GPREmResult© tizagrp.com
IEEE 80 example B.1: 70 m square grid with 11 conductors per side and its mesh voltage against the tolerable touch voltage. Location in the system and operating principle. Illustrative: real values come from the nameplate and the manufacturer's manual.
Short answer

Example 1 of Annex B of IEEE Std 80-2013 designs a 70 m × 70 m square grid, with no rods, in 400 Ω·m soil. The proposed grid gives a resistance of 2.78 Ω, a ground potential rise of 5,304 V and a mesh voltage of 1,002.1 V, higher than the tolerable touch voltage of 838.2 V: the design fails and must be modified. Example 2 corrects it with 20 rods.

Short answer

Example 1 of Annex B of IEEE Std 80-2013 walks through the design procedure with a 70 m × 70 m square grid, with no rods, in 400 Ω·m soil. The result teaches something useful: the first proposal does not comply, because its mesh voltage (1,002.1 V) exceeds the tolerable touch voltage (838.2 V). The general procedure is in the substation grounding grid guide; here the numbers are shown. The tolerable limits come from the tolerable body current.

Starting data of the example

DataValue
GridSquare, 70 m × 70 m (4,900 m²), no rods
Soil resistivity400 Ω·m
Fault and shock duration0.5 s
Surface layer0.102 m (4 in), 2,500 Ω·m wet
Person’s weight70 kg (area not accessible to the public)
Fault at the 115 kV bus3,180 A (X/R ratio of 3.33)
Fault at the 13 kV bus6,814 A (X/R ratio of 16.2)
Current split factor0.6

The substation’s real grid sits in a 63 m × 84 m rectangle (5,292 m²); for the initial evaluation an equivalent 70 m × 70 m square grid is assumed.

The calculation step by step

Step 2: conductor size

The 13 kV fault is the larger, 6,814 A, and is used to size the conductor. With a time of 0.5 s, the standard takes the decrement factor as approximately 1.0 (fault asymmetry is explained in short-circuit peak factor and X/R ratio), so the asymmetrical current is also 6,814 A.

With hard-drawn copper, a 40 °C ambient and a melting temperature of 1,084 °C, the cross-section is 6.814 × 7.06 × √0.5 = 34.02 kcmil (17.2 mm²). That is equivalent to a solid conductor of about 4.7 mm. A No. 4 AWG cable could do, but for mechanical strength a stranded 2/0 AWG, 0.0105 m in diameter, is preferred as a minimum. The resistance formula is explained in grounding resistance of a grid.

As an alternative, a copper-clad steel of 30 % conductivity with a conservative limit of 700 °C gives a cross-section equivalent to 6.2 mm in diameter, less than the 10 mm desired. A 2/0 AWG of that material also works.

Step 3: tolerable voltages

  • Reduction factor of the surface layer (Cs): 0.74. It is calculated with the standard’s empirical form: 1 − 0.09 (1 − ρ/ρs) / (2 hs + 0.09), with ρ = 400 Ω·m, ρs = 2,500 Ω·m and hs = 0.102 m.
  • Tolerable step voltage (70 kg person): (1000 + 6 Cs ρs) × 0.157 / √ts = 2,686.6 V.
  • Tolerable touch voltage (70 kg person): (1000 + 1.5 Cs ρs) × 0.157 / √ts = 838.2 V.

Step 4: initial design

A 70 m × 70 m grid with conductors equally spaced every 7 m (D = 7 m), a depth of 0.5 m and no rods. That gives 11 conductors in each direction and a total buried length of 2 × 11 × 70 m = 1,540 m.

Step 5: grid resistance

Resistance = ρ [1/LT + 1/√(20 A) × (1 + 1/(1 + h √(20/A)))], with LT = 1,540 m and A = 4,900 m². Result: 2.78 Ω.

The EPRI calculation program gave 2.67 Ω for this case.

Step 6: maximum grid current

IG = Df × Sf × 3I0 = 1.0 × 0.6 × 3,180 = 1,908 A.

The 115 kV fault (3,180 A) is used and not the 13 kV one (6,814 A), even though the latter is larger, because the grounded 13 kV winding is a local source of current and does not contribute to the ground potential rise.

Step 7: ground potential rise

GPR = IG × Rg = 1,908 × 2.78 = 5,304 V. It far exceeds the 838 V of tolerable touch voltage, so the mesh voltage check continues. The origin of that current is in maximum grid current and split factor.

Step 8: mesh voltage

  • Km (geometric factor), with Kii = 0.57 and Kh = 1.225: 0.89.
  • n (effective parallel conductors): 11 (square grid).
  • Ki (irregularity factor) = 0.644 + 0.148 n: 2.272.
  • Mesh voltage = ρ × IG × Km × Ki / LM = 400 × 1,908 × 0.89 × 2.272 / 1,540 = 1,002.1 V.

Step 9: comparison

The mesh voltage, 1,002.1 V, is higher than the tolerable touch voltage, 838.2 V. The design must be modified. The EPRI program gave 984.3 V, a very close result.

Result of example 1
  1. Data and conductor size. Soil, fault current and clearing time
  2. Tolerable voltages. Step: 2,686.6 V; touch: 838.2 V
  3. Resistance, grid current and ground potential rise. 2.78 Ω, 1,908 A and 5,304 V
  4. Is the mesh voltage lower than the tolerable one? Yes: continue; No: The design is modified; example 2 adds rods.
  5. Complete design. With the refinements for equipment and arresters

What changes in the following examples

  • Example 2 (square with rods). With the same grid, 20 rods of 7.5 m are added on the perimeter. The mesh voltage drops to 747.4 V, below the 838.2 V tolerable, and the design complies. Only the detail remains to be completed: equipment pigtails and additional rods at arresters.
  • Example 3 (rectangular with rods). The grid takes the real dimensions of 63 m × 84 m, with 1,659 m of conductor and 38 rods of 10 m.
  • Example 4 (L-shaped with rods). It shows the calculation for an irregularly shaped grid.

The lesson: in this example, the rods on the perimeter lowered the mesh voltage from 1,002.1 V to 747.4 V, and covering the whole area with grid was not enough to comply.

How to use the example

The example is useful to understand the order of the calculation and to compare your own values. With real data, the fault current comes from the short-circuit study, the soil model from the resistivity measurement and the clearing time from the protection. You can try your own data with the free Grounding resistance tool.

How we do it at Tiza Group

At Tiza Group we do the design and verification of the grid for medium, high and extra-high voltage substations and industrial plants with real data and, when the case requires it, with calculation programs. Learn about our engineering design and studies service or write to us. We deliver it remotely, worldwide.

References

  • IEEE Std 80-2013, IEEE Guide for Safety in AC Substation Grounding, Annex B, examples 1 to 4; clauses 16.4 and 16.5.

Frequently asked questions

Why does the example fail if the grid looks large?

Because the calculated mesh voltage, 1,002.1 V, exceeds the tolerable touch voltage of 838.2 V. The grid's ground potential rise, 5,304 V, also far exceeds the tolerable value, so it is not enough for the grid to cover the whole area: the mesh voltage must be lowered, for example with rods or with closer conductors.

What fault current was used for the example design?

The fault was calculated at the 115 kV bus (3,180 A) and at the 13 kV bus (6,814 A). The conductor is sized with the larger one, 6,814 A. But the ground potential rise is calculated with the 115 kV fault, because the grounded-wye 13 kV winding is a local source of fault current and does not contribute to the ground potential rise.

Can I use these numbers in my substation?

No. They are data from the standard's example: the soil, currents, area and clearing time change in every substation. The example is useful to understand the order of the calculation and to compare with your own values.

WhatsApp